Back to Previous Page
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2002-07-25-nceditf1_x.htm
This article looks at the possible drawbacks of having UPS and other common workers serving as the “eyes and ears” for the government and reporting suspicious activities.
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/techpolicy/2002-09-05-internet-freedoms_x.htm
This article examines international instances where countries have used national security as an excuse to hamper civil liberties.
http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,54099,00.html
This article looks at cyber-terrorism as it relates to American businesses.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20020920/pl_nm/attack_surveillance_dc_1
This article provides an overview of the wave of surveillance and Big Brother-ish technologies that have been implemented post 9/11.
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/aug2002/nf20020815_7186.htm
This article examines the ubiquity of surveillance cameras.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2002/09/16/BA229715.DTL
This article takes a look back at one woman’s experience under scrutiny by the FBI.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A35812-2002Sep18.html
This article describes the IT industry climate as it relates to security.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38477-2002Sep4.html
This article highlights new laws that favor security, while compromising privacy.
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0230/baard.php
This article discusses some of the immediate drawbacks of Ashcroft’s citizens corps spy program.
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1107-957464.html
This is an opinion piece about the overall deterioration of privacy, post 9/11.
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1107-956847.html
This article questions how national security initiatives implemented today might affect us once the threat of terrorism has passed.
Respond on the Message Board
Back to Previous Page
|